Think tank points to Tor launcher’s failure to identify PS752 as civilian aircraft

The investigation is yet to establish the exact mode of the Russian-made missile launcher’s operation at the time of the strike.

The deadly missile launch targeting a civilian aircraft bound to Kyiv suggests either a deliberate act by the operator or flawed Russian software, a think tank reported.

The Iranian Aerospace Forces claim that “during the flight, the aircraft appeared to be in close proximity to one of the important military facilities of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, resembling a hostile object in shape and altitude,” according to IGDTS think tank.

Commander of Aerospace Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Amir Ali Hajizadeh, said the air defense command post commander in the area of responsibility near the airport sent a missile launch permission request to the higher command, and, having received no response within 10 seconds, decided to strike.

Commander of Aerospace Force of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Amir Ali Hajizadeh, said the air defense command post commander in the area of responsibility near the airport sent a missile launch permission request to the higher command, and, having received no response within 10 seconds, decided to strike.

The question arises as to the mode the air defense system was operating in. If it was automatic mode, the operator had to make a decision to cancel the missile launch within 10 seconds. In the case of manual mode, he had to make the decision to strike. Thus, from a legal point of view, the investigation has to find out whether it was action or inaction that led to the plane crash.

Russian TOR launchers supplied to Iran in 2007 did not have an automatic mode option.

If the system did operate automatically, this means that Russia had upgraded the Tors after 2007.

Tor’s radar target detection range is 32 km. The distance from the runway edge to the probable launch site is 30 km. Concequently, the “target” should have come on within the radar screen, rather than coming from the area outside the radar coverage. The air defense system crew had to be aware of ​​their position and situation around them, including at the airport, its runway, and corridors for civilian flights.

On January 9, 2020, Tehran Airport’s online schedule indicated that a number of other civilian aircraft had taken off starting 05:23 local time before PS752 departure on 06:13 with intervals of eight to 33 minutes.

Thus, the air defense launcher crew should have seen “targets” similar to PS752 between 4:32 and 06:12. The FlightRadar24 data illustrates an identical altitude gain for five airplanes that took off during this timeframe.

Thus, even under psychological stress, the launcher crew could not see flight PS752 as something unexpected or out of the norm to identify it as a hostile object, presumably a “cruise missile”.

(c) Unian

9 comments

  • “Thus, the air defense launcher crew should have seen “targets” similar to PS752 between 4:32 and 06:12. The FlightRadar24 data illustrates an identical altitude gain for five airplanes that took off during this timeframe.”

    Let me guess, just as the Ukrainian plane was taking off, Iran receive intelligence data from Muscovy, saying their is a US cruise missile heading your way.

    Liked by 5 people

  • That is quite possible. Likely even.
    Supplying such weaponry to a terror regime is a crime in itself. Let’s have some serious sanctions this time eh?

    Liked by 5 people

  • “The deadly missile launch targeting a civilian aircraft bound to Kyiv suggests either a deliberate act by the operator or flawed Russian software, a think tank reported.”

    Both … flawed equipment and idiots at the controls. Indeed, a deadly combo.

    Liked by 4 people

  • ‘If the system did operate automatically, this means that Russia had upgraded the Tors after 2007.’

    Let me guess, the upgrade was originally intended for systems stationed in the Crimea and Donbas.

    Liked by 3 people

  • I did not want to mention it, in particular not on WP, but i think those who know a bit about my life with two gurlz should know. Suzanna and me suffered a terrible loss for the second time. We decided to not try again. Luckily we have our Larisa to support us. Don’t be bothered, just take notice, and please never ask about it again. Thank you.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.