Pipeline gas or LNG? Ukraine doesn’t keep all its eggs in one basket

This article is part of our special report Ukraine gas transit: What’s at stake.

Ukraine has for decades counted exclusively on Russian pipeline gas, for its own use and for the lucrative transit taxes. But the tensions with Russia after 2014 and the low prices of LNG have changed the paradigm completely.

One of the least known secrets is that LNG from the United States has become highly competitive versus Russian pipeline gas. The unconventional gas revolution in the US has boosted the US economy and the country’s export capacity to 112 bcm/y as of 2020, more than doubling the capacity in just 18 months.

According to the International Energy Agency, in 2018, Europe saved $8 billion on its natural gas bills thanks to the import of US LNG. This huge difference is also the result of a downward renegotiation of Russian pipeline exports.

Even a country like Bulgaria, probably the most “addicted” to Russian pipeline gas, bought the first LNG from the US last May, at prices which were not disclosed. But as energy minister Temenujka Petkova said, they were lower than what the country pays for Russian pipeline gas.

Imports from the US are expected to grow substantially, after Bulgaria and Greece complete in 2020 the gas interconnector Stara Zagora-Komotini.

LNG is natural gas that is cooled to -161 C, at which point it becomes a liquid and occupies only 1/600th of its original volume, making it convenient for shipping. The process needs liquefaction plants, specially designed ships fitted with cryogenic cooling tanks, regasification terminals.

Russia says the process is very expensive and pipeline gas will always be cheaper. But Russia has also hugely overspent on developing gas in the northern Yamal peninsula and cannot push its price down.

The whole Russian strategy of having long-term contracts for imported pipeline gas is in shambles, as clients seek flexible commercial terms. As an example, it is impossible to imagine that the 10-year Russia-Ukraine gas transit contract expiring on 31 December 2019 could be renewed in terms similar to those of 2009.

Europe’s largest gas storages

As it is impossible to predict what will happen after 1 January, Ukraine doesn’t keep all its eggs in one basket. One of the assets the country inherited from the former Soviet Union are the huge underground gas storages (UGS), the largest in Europe, located mainly close to the border with EU neighbours (Poland, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania).

These UGS, with a capacity of 31 bcm, can store gas purchased from the Baltic Pipe and Świnoujście LNG terminal in Poland.

Moreover, 10 bcm of storage capacity in the West of Ukraine is unutilised because of bottlenecks created by Gazprom. Unlocking those interconnectors between Ukraine and the EU will make those 10 bcm of extra storage available for traders.

Ukraine’s strategy is to accumulate gas when the prices are low and sell it to EU consumers during price increases, thus mitigating price spikes. The role of Ukrainian UGSs gets even more significant in balancing scenarios with gradually growing LNG influx to Europe.

Andrew Favorov, head of the Integrated Gas Business Unit at Naftogaz, told EURACTIV that Ukraine could also serve as gas storage for distant clients. He explained that the world gas production during the year is uniform, while the consumption is seasonal, peaking in the first and the last quarter.

“The most profitable market for gas supplies is Asia, mainly Japan, South Korea and China. Therefore, gas producers target those markets for supplies. But the Asian countries do not have gas storages. The world gas summer production needs to be stored somewhere, and Ukraine has a huge potential for the commercialization of its storages. We see that this service is requested,” he said.

Favorov also said that European independent traders already store in Ukraine significant volumes that were injected during the summer and will be used during the winter.

“All the preconditions to make this business successful are there”, he stressed.

An additional reason why Ukraine really needs to be prepared for a completely different gas business is the uncertainty about the two Russian pipelines bringing the Russian gas into Ukraine.

Reportedly, these have not been properly maintained over the last 30 years and there is a risk that Russian gas will stop flowing in Ukraine for purely technical reasons.

[Edited by Zoran Radosavljevic]

(c) Euractiv

3 comments

  • “According to the International Energy Agency, in 2018, Europe saved $8 billion on its natural gas bills thanks to the import of US LNG.”

    Could someone explain how Nord Stream will result in cheaper gas for Europe, when all the evidence proves otherwise?

    Liked by 4 people

    • There is a gas price war going on now as the United States and Russia fight for market share and U.S. policy to curb E.U reliance on Russian gas. Right now, European prices are so low that, after factoring in the cost of shipping, the U.S. is exporting natural gas at a loss.

      Liked by 4 people

  • For years we are reading about Ukraine’s potential and opportunities, but when the hell will Ukraine take advantage of them??? Ukraine remains a corrupt swamp and Zelensky may make things worse. Ukraine doesn’t need blah blah – she needs ACTION!

    Liked by 4 people

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.