Russia’s Foreign Ministry says it expects the International Court of
Justice to “take full regard” of the Kremlin’s arguments in a case filed
against Russia by Kyiv and will “eventually reject all of Ukraine’s
claims.”
The ministry made the remarks in a statement issued on November 9, a day
after the United Nations court ruled that it has jurisdiction to hear
Kyiv’s terrorism-financing complaint against Russia over Moscow’s
activities in eastern Ukraine.
The ICJ said conditions had been met for the case to be heard in full.
It also rejected Russiaβs argument that the court does not have
jurisdiction in the case.
Kyiv alleges Moscow has breached a treaty on terrorism financing by
arming and supporting pro-Russia separatists in eastern Ukraine since
2014.
Kyiv has also charged that Russia-installed authorities have been
suppressing the rights of ethnic Tatars and other minorities since
Russia occupied and forcibly seized Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula in 2014.
The case opens a new legal front in strained relations between Russia and Ukraine and could take years to resolve.
Ukrainian armed forces have been fighting Russia-backed separatists in
eastern Ukraine in a conflict that has killed more than 13,000 people
since April 2014.
Ukraine has asked the court to order Moscow to stop financing
separatists in eastern Ukraine and to pay compensation for attacks —
including the July 2014 downing of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 over
separatist-controlled territory in eastern Ukraine, which killed all 298
passengers and crew on board.
Russia denies involvement in the downing of the passenger jet.
However, a Dutch-led international investigation concluded that the plane was shot down by a Russian Buk missile launcher positioned in separatist-controlled territory.
Ukraine has also asked the UN court to order Russia to stop discriminating against ethnic Tartars in Crimea.
(c) Radio Free Liberty
“The ICJ said conditions had been met for the case to be heard in full. It also rejected Russiaβs argument that the court does not have jurisdiction in the case.”
So according to Muscovy, this court has no jurisdiction, unless it rejects the claims made by Ukraine. If it finds Muscovy guilty, the they will not recognise the court, and say it has no jurisdiction, or more than likely, take no notice of any court decisions against them, knowing the toothless courts will do nothing.
The part that really gets me is that the useless entity UN itself should have the initiative do all of the things that Ukraine is driving for. What else is this pack of tax wasters in office for?